MANY STORIES

MANY STORIES
As I have looked back through the archive, I have found that the same events can sometimes support very different interpretations.
One reading may make the story seem psychological. Another may make it seem technological, synchronistic, experimental or something else entirely.
I do not want to choose between those possibilities simply to make the story coherent.
This section allows different stories to exist alongside one another.
THE PREMISE
The deeper the sequence investigation goes, the less convincing a single definitive narrative becomes.
The same twenty-four pieces can support several readings because meaning is distributed across titles, sounds, descriptions, order, historical context and the observer.
OPEN QUESTION / MULTIPLE READINGSTHE FIVE READINGS
THE PROBLEM WITH ALL FIVE
Each story can make the others feel obvious once it has been proposed.
That is exactly why the archive keeps the alternatives visible. A compelling interpretation is not automatically a historical fact.